Defense seeks insanity verdict after Clancy trial ends in hung jury

TL;DR Summary
Lindsay Clancy’s defense asked a Massachusetts judge to declare her not guilty by reason of insanity after the murder trial ended in a mistrial when one juror prevented a unanimous verdict. The defense argued prosecutors failed to prove she lacked mental illness and pointed to postpartum psychosis, noting 11 of 12 jurors were prepared to find NGRI before a lone holdout blocked a verdict. A hearing is set for September 29 as prosecutors decide whether to retry the case.
- Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer asks judge to find her not guilty after mistrial The Guardian
- Clancy holdout juror mimicked strangling during deliberations, juror claims ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
- Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer asks the judge to spare her a second trial for killing her children AP News
- Lone holdout in Lindsay Clancy trial demonstrated the killings during deliberations, fellow juror says Fox News
- Following mistrial, Clancy attorney asks court to find her not guilty WBUR
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
12
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
82%
428 → 79 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Guardian