Supreme Court Rejects Challenges to Media Defamation Protections, but Clarence Thomas Pushes for Reconsideration
The US Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by former Massey Energy CEO Donald Blankenship to make it easier for public figures to sue for defamation, upholding longstanding protections for news organizations. Blankenship had filed a defamation lawsuit against media outlets including Fox News and MSNBC for characterizing him as a "felon" during his 2018 Senate run. The Supreme Court's unanimous 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan set strict limits on defamation claims by public officials, requiring proof of "actual malice." Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the decision but expressed his view that the court should reconsider the precedent in an "appropriate case."
- US Supreme Court turns away challenge to media defamation protections Reuters
- Supreme Court declines to revisit landmark libel ruling, though Clarence Thomas wants to reconsider the decision CNN
- The Supreme Court rejects an appeal from former coal company CEO Don Blankenship The Associated Press
- Clarence Thomas Renews Call for Reconsideration of Landmark Libel Ruling The New York Times
- Supreme Court Rejects Defamation Case—But Clarence Thomas Still Wants To Make It Harder For Media To ‘Cast False Aspersions’ Forbes
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
9
3 min
vs 4 min read
83%
639 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters