"Biden's Battle Against Social Media Censorship Intensifies"

The Biden administration has appealed the federal court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction against the government's censorship regime in Missouri v. Biden. Law professors Leah Litman and Laurence Tribe published an article criticizing the court's ruling, but their analysis overlooks the evidence and legal questions at hand. The court's ruling is based on the government's coercion, significant encouragement, joint participation, entwinement, and legal immunity, all of which constitute state action and potentially violate the First Amendment. The case involves a massive attack on free speech rights, with the government controlling a censorship-industrial complex. Government censorship is unconstitutional, regardless of the truthfulness of the censored information, and it reveals a contempt for the intelligence and judgment of ordinary Americans. The battle against the government's censorship empire will likely continue through the federal appellate courts and may reach the U.S. Supreme Court.