DOJ Antitrust Probe Targets Networks for Pausing Trump Coverage

3 min read
Source: CNBC
TL;DR

The Department of Justice is investigating ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, and NBC for potential Sherman Act violations after they suspended pooled coverage of President Trump. This follows a White House ban on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, which triggered a temporary halt in shared video footage. While the DOJ views this as a restraint of trade, legal experts argue the action is protected by the First Amendment and serves as a tool for political intimidation.

Key points

  • The DOJ is examining whether the White House TV press pool violated antitrust laws by halting coverage.
  • The probe targets ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, and NBC following a Sept. 21 suspension of pooled footage.
  • The suspension occurred after the White House barred CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from accessing the president.
  • A federal judge restored access to the banned outlets on Sept. 24, but Air Force One exclusions persisted.
  • Legal experts and press freedom advocates argue the investigation lacks legal merit and ignores First Amendment protections.

Background

This dispute escalates a broader pattern of tensions between the Trump administration and the media, which includes previous lawsuits against outlets like The New York Times and BBC News, as well as efforts to rescind federal funding for public broadcasters. The current probe is the latest in a series of actions targeting news organizations that have produced critical coverage of the administration's policies.

How outlets are covering it

The DOJ and the White House frame the networks' collective pause as an illegal restraint of trade under the Sherman Act, demanding communications and materials from the broadcasters. In contrast, The Washington Post and legal experts, including Seth Stern of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, characterize the probe as 'nonsense' and a 'thin' legal ground, arguing that antitrust law has long recognized First Amendment exceptions for media cooperation. The New York Times notes that the probe was triggered by the networks' solidarity with banned outlets, while The Washington Post emphasizes that such actions are part of a larger strategy to pressure the press.

Why it matters

This investigation represents a significant escalation in the conflict between the executive branch and the news media. If successful, it could set a precedent for using antitrust laws to punish media organizations for coordinated actions in support of press freedom, potentially chilling future cooperation among news outlets and undermining the independence of the press.

What to watch

The DOJ is expected to demand further communications and materials from the networks as part of its investigation. The outcome of the ongoing lawsuit filed by CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over the White House ban may also influence the trajectory of this antitrust probe. Additionally, the networks' response to the DOJ's demands will be a key indicator of the administration's ability to pressure the media through legal means.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on CNBC