SCOTUS weighs privacy limits as geofence data enters the courtroom in Chatrie v. United States
TL;DR
In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how much police can track people via cellphones using geofence data, with some justices sounding alarms about broad surveillance and others voicing law-enforcement concerns. Analysts expect a narrow ruling that preserves Carpenter-like warrant requirements but stops short of sweeping new protections, while questions about targeting political groups or other sensitive data may linger for future cases.
Topics:nationpolitics#carpenter-v-united-states#cellphone-data#geofence-warrants#politics#privacy#scotus
- The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone vox.com
- Supreme Court grapples with whether police may seek sweeping cellphone location data in investigations CNN
- US supreme court hears whether smartphone location data warrants infringe users’ privacy The Guardian
- Ingenious? Orwellian? Or both? Supreme Court considers constitutionality of 'geofence' warrants NPR
- Digital location data heads back to the Supreme Court SCOTUSblog
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on vox.com