Spencer Pratt's LA mayoral bid collapses under self-sabotage
Los Angeles Times columnist Gustavo Arellano argues that Spencer Pratt began with strong advantages (a relatable origin story, an emboldened base, and fundraising) but misread LA’s political culture by leaning into angry, anti-progressive rhetoric, neglecting broad outreach and key debates. Pratt finished third with about 26% of the vote, behind Karen Bass and Nithya Raman, highlighting that his self-created arrogance and celebrity-focused approach prevented a broader coalition and lasting support in a largely liberal city. The piece concludes Pratt’s real obstacle wasn’t policy so much as a perceived lack of faith in or love for Los Angeles, urging him to stay and push for change rather than leave.
- Commentary: Spencer Pratt could have been a real contender. His greatest enemy was himself Los Angeles Times
- Why the L.A. mayoral runoff is about to be a ‘knife fight’ Los Angeles Times
- How Spencer Pratt’s ‘patently absurd’ bid for Los Angeles mayor fell flat The Guardian
- Nithya Raman overtakes Spencer Pratt for 2nd place in LA mayoral race, results show NBC Los Angeles
- 1st look at election results in LA mayor race ABC7 Los Angeles
Reading Insights
0
5
15 min
vs 16 min read
96%
3,046 → 108 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Los Angeles Times