Trump’s Rally Remark on Iranian Attacks on U.S. Cities Sparks Sharp California Backlash

2 min read
Source: Los Angeles Times
Trump’s Rally Remark on Iranian Attacks on U.S. Cities Sparks Sharp California Backlash
Photo: Los Angeles Times
TL;DR

President Trump suggested at a Nebraska rally that Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego as a small price for national security, prompting immediate condemnation from California leaders who called the remarks dangerous and reckless.

Key points

  • Trump stated at a Grand Island, Nebraska rally that allowing Iran to destroy Los Angeles or San Diego was a minor cost compared to global safety.
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom labeled the president 'deranged and dangerous,' linking the comments to recent federal military deployments in the state.
  • Los Angeles and San Diego mayors condemned the remarks, with San Diego’s mayor emphasizing the city is not 'collateral damage.'
  • White House communications director Steven Cheung defended the comments, asserting they highlighted the threat of a nuclear Iran and that the U.S. is now safer.
  • Officials noted there is no credible intelligence suggesting Iran currently possesses the range or capability to attack the continental United States.

Background

This incident occurs amid ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and California’s Democratic leadership, which have escalated over immigration enforcement and National Guard deployments. The remarks also follow earlier warnings in March regarding potential drone threats in California, which officials later dismissed as lacking credible intelligence.

How outlets are covering it

The Los Angeles Times and USA Today reported the event as a serious political controversy, highlighting the lack of evidence for Iran’s ability to attack U.S. cities. FOX 11 Los Angeles framed the comments as likely tongue-in-cheek but noted the severe backlash. California leaders, including Governor Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, viewed the remarks as dangerous and potentially compromising public safety, while the White House and Republican Congressman Darrell Issa defended them as necessary warnings about the threat of a nuclear Iran.

Why it matters

The remarks intensified political divisions between the federal government and California, raising concerns about public safety and the rhetoric surrounding the ongoing Iran conflict. They also highlighted the sensitivity of discussing potential attacks on major U.S. cities during a campaign rally.

What to watch

California’s Governor’s Office of Emergency Services is monitoring for any potential threats, though no confirmed threats exist. The White House continues to defend the president’s stance, while California leaders maintain their criticism. The midterm elections in November will likely see continued political tension over these issues.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on Los Angeles Times