Manhattan Hearing Probes Limits of Press Subpoenas in National Security Probe

TL;DR Summary
In a Manhattan courtroom, Judge Subramanian questions the DOJ’s use of subpoenas on New York Times journalists and related phone records in a national-security investigation, pressing the government to show it met Gonzales v. Gonzales standards and to justify any deviations from reporting regulations. After revealing several missteps, including a misleading non-disclosure filing, the DOJ agrees to withdraw the subpoenas while preserving options for future action and maintaining jurisdiction for related matters. The hearing underscores ongoing tension between national security investigations and First Amendment-era protections for the press.
Topics:nation#gonzales-test#journalist-subpoenas#national-security#non-disclosure-orders#press-freedom#us
- The Subpoena Detective: A Dispatch from the Times Hearing Lawfare
- Senate Democrats Press Blanche on Times Subpoenas The New York Times
- Senate Democrats investigating DOJ subpoenas of New York Times reporters The Hill
- Trump’s DOJ says it will withdraw subpoenas targeting NY Times reporters CNN
- It sure looks like Jay Clayton lied to Congress about the NYT subpoenas Freedom of the Press Foundation
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
10
Time Saved
17 min
vs 18 min read
Condensed
97%
3,457 → 88 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Lawfare