Holdout Juror's Doubts Spotlight Insanity Defense in Clancy Case

A lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s triple-murder trial acknowledged doubts about the prosecution but could not accept not guilty by lack of criminal responsibility, underscoring broad skepticism of the insanity defense and the difficulties of persuading juries, even as Massachusetts law frames the burden of proof; a retrial is possible and the case continues to fuel debate about mental illness and accountability.