"Defense Strategies and Bias Claims Clash in Georgia Case of Fake Trump Electors"

Lawyers for three Georgia Republicans charged in a racketeering indictment for casting false Electoral College votes for former President Donald J. Trump argued in federal court that they submitted the votes as part of their "duty" under federal law. The defense lawyers are hoping to move the case to federal court or have their clients' cases dismissed. Prosecutors countered that the electors acted in their own self-interest and in the interest of their preferred candidate, and that the lawsuit filed by one of the defendants was "meritless." Pretrial jockeying is also ongoing in state court, with defense lawyers seeking to interview members of the grand jury and the prosecution pointing to potential conflicts of interest among the defense lawyers.
- Lawyers for Fake Trump Electors Hint at Defense Strategy in Georgia Case The New York Times
- Georgia prosecutors push back against claims of anti-Trump bias at fiery hearing for 3 fake GOP electors CNN
- Georgia Trump electors argue they acted under federal authority The Washington Post
- Trump co-defendant Chesebro advances adventurous ‘fake elector’ argument MSNBC
- The Untold Story of One Indicted Fake Trump Elector in Georgia The Daily Beast
Reading Insights
0
10
4 min
vs 5 min read
88%
952 → 119 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times