DLA Piper avoids pregnancy bias verdict as jury clears firm on maternity-leave firing

TL;DR Summary
A Manhattan federal jury ruled that DLA Piper did not discriminate on the basis of pregnancy, finding the firm’s firing of Anisha Mehta after she requested maternity leave was justified by performance concerns, in a rare high-profile discrimination trial involving a major law firm.
- Law firm DLA Piper defeats ex-lawyer's pregnancy bias lawsuit at trial Reuters
- DLA Piper Partner Rejects Pregnant Atty's Account Of Firing Law360
- Associate Mistakes, Compensation Part of Opening Arguments in DLA Piper Pregnancy Bias Trial Law.com
- DLA Piper Prevails in Discrimination Lawsuit by Ex-Associate Bloomberg Law News
- Pregnant DLA Piper Atty Fired For 'Sloppy' Work, Jury Told Law360
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
25
Time Saved
57 min
vs 58 min read
Condensed
100%
11,498 → 44 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters