JPMorgan Files Motion to Dismiss Rana Suit, Alleging Fabricated Testimony

Key points

• JPMorgan filed a motion in Manhattan federal court seeking the 'most serious sanction' against Chirayu Rana for alleged perjury and misconduct.
• The bank alleges Rana’s sister, Chandani Rana, and friend Allan Flott provided false testimony to support claims of sexual assault and racism.
• Chandani Rana initially claimed she saw Hajdini kiss her brother and say 'I own you, Brownie,' but later retracted this testimony in writing.
• Allan Flott claimed Hajdini invited him to a threesome, stating 'I own Chirayu, so you’d better come join,' though he has not yet retracted this statement.
• Rana’s current attorney, Jon Norinsberg, has requested to leave the case, citing 'irreconcilable differences,' following the departure of previous high-profile counsel.
• Hajdini’s lawyer stated that while no order can fully restore her reputation, the court can end the 'fraudulent litigation' and hold those responsible accountable.

Background

This development follows a September 2026 countersuit by Lorna Hajdini, who alleged that Rana fabricated sexual assault and racism claims to extort money and damage her career. The dispute occurs amid broader legal challenges for JPMorgan, including a massive sexual harassment class action involving over 1,200 claimants and a separate suit alleging anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination. The current filing intensifies the legal battle by focusing on the credibility of witnesses rather than just the underlying conduct.

How outlets are covering it

The New York Post reports the details of the new filing, highlighting the specific retraction by Rana’s sister and the bank’s request for severe sanctions. The Post frames the situation as a clear case of fabricated evidence, noting that Rana’s sister explicitly denied seeing any inappropriate conduct after initially swearing to the contrary. The secondary source from TMZ was inaccessible due to a server error, so no alternative perspective could be compared. However, the primary source notes that Rana’s legal team has previously rejected similar counterclaims as retaliatory, suggesting a dispute over the motive behind the allegations.

Why it matters

This case highlights the severe legal and reputational consequences of unverified workplace misconduct claims, particularly in high-stakes financial sectors. The involvement of family members in providing false testimony raises questions about the integrity of litigation processes and the potential for abuse of harassment laws. For JPMorgan, the outcome could set a precedent for how the bank handles internal complaints and the liability associated with third-party testimony in such disputes.

What to watch

The court must now decide whether to grant the motion to dismiss based on the alleged perjury and misconduct. Rana’s legal team will need to find new representation after his current attorney requested to leave. If the motion is granted, the case may be dismissed, potentially leading to a judgment in favor of JPMorgan and Hajdini regarding legal costs. If denied, the case will proceed to trial, where the credibility of the witnesses will be a central issue.