Common Sense Media urges OpenAI to halt teen access after safety test failures

Common Sense Media’s Youth AI Safety Institute rated ChatGPT for Teens an 'unacceptable risk' after testing over 4,000 prompts. The report found that parental alerts for suicide and self-harm often failed to trigger, and crisis referrals were missed in over 25% of cases. OpenAI disputes the findings, citing methodology flaws, while the nonprofit urges blocking teen access until safeguards are improved.
Key points
- Common Sense Media tested 4,000+ prompts on teen accounts and found parental alerts failed to trigger during hour-long discussions of self-harm.
- The report states ChatGPT missed crisis referrals in more than 1 in 4 instances where outside help was warranted.
- OpenAI disputes the findings, claiming tests occurred before parental controls were fully activated and that age verification requires multiple signals.
- The report notes failures in California’s Adam’s Law requirements, which will take effect in July 2027.
- Common Sense Media urges OpenAI to pause marketing to minors until safety gaps are addressed.
Background
OpenAI launched ChatGPT for Teens in August 2026, promising stronger safeguards for users aged 13-17. This follows a 2025 wrongful death lawsuit from a California couple alleging ChatGPT assisted their 16-year-old son’s suicide. The new California law, Adam’s Law, was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2026 and will mandate specific AI safety standards for minors starting in July 2027.
How outlets are covering it
Common Sense Media, represented by Tom Siegel, argues the product is 'dangerous' and 'buggy,' stating that marketing promises were not backed by engineering. They emphasize that parental controls, like Study Mode, can be easily bypassed. OpenAI counters that the testing methodology was flawed, claiming parental alerts were tested before accounts were fully linked, a process that can take hours. OpenAI also states that age verification intentionally uses multiple signals over up to two weeks, during which enhanced protections are applied, rather than relying solely on stated age. Gizmodo highlights the risk of emotional dependence, while the Los Angeles Times notes the report’s findings align with upcoming state regulations.
Why it matters
The findings raise concerns about the reliability of AI safeguards for vulnerable minors. If parental alerts and crisis referrals fail, teens may face unmonitored exposure to harmful content. The dispute highlights a gap between corporate safety promises and real-world performance, potentially influencing future AI regulation and parental trust in digital tools.
What to watch
OpenAI is expected to address the specific gaps identified, particularly in crisis referrals and parental alert activation. Common Sense Media is calling for OpenAI to share data and partner with independent researchers. The outcome may influence the implementation of California’s Adam’s Law and other state-level AI safety regulations for minors.
- "Not safe for kids": Advocacy group urges OpenAI to keep teens off ChatGPT Axios
- Why My Conversations with OpenAI’s ‘ChatGPT for Teens’ Made Me Very Worried The New York Times
- ChatGPT for Teens Carries ‘Unacceptable Risk’ for Teens, Report Claims Gizmodo
- Helping teens learn, plan, and shape the future of AI OpenAI
- ChatGPT’s teen safeguards failed to alert parents during suicide conversations, report finds Los Angeles Times
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Axios