OpenAI accused of hiding chat logs in NYT copyright battle

OpenAI faces serious sanctions in a high-stakes copyright lawsuit led by The New York Times after allegations that it concealed and improperly handled ChatGPT output logs that could prove or refute infringement. Plaintiffs say OpenAI had large de-identified log samples and misrepresented their accessibility, then used heavy redactions and deletions to hinder discovery, while OpenAI counters that it protects user privacy and fair use. The court constrained access to a 20 million-log sample and highlighted issues with a much larger 78 million-log set, raising the possibility that sanctions could bar the use of the 20 million sample and weaken OpenAI’s defense in a case that could hinge on whether training on copyrighted content constitutes fair use.
- OpenAI faked inability to search training data, hid billions of logs, NYT says Ars Technica
- News outlets urge a judge to sanction OpenAI in a high-stakes AI copyright fight AP News
- New York Times and Other Publishers Ask Court to Penalize OpenAI The New York Times
- The Denver Post seeks ‘serious sanctions’ against OpenAI as deception alleged in copyright lawsuit The Denver Post
- New York Times says OpenAI hid evidence in ChatGPT copyright trial TechCrunch
Reading Insights
0
5
7 min
vs 8 min read
93%
1,575 → 116 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Ars Technica