Supergirl stumbles after a strong start, despite Alcock’s spark

TL;DR Summary
Slate’s Dana Stevens praises Milly Alcock’s Kara but argues the Supergirl follow-up falls into familiar superhero traps: a dull villain, muddy CGI, and an underused Lobo, with a tonal mismatch that even a darker subplot about kidnapping young women for breeding can’t redeem. The piece suggests the DCU needs stronger direction from James Gunn to live up to the promise of Superman, leaving open the door for future installments.
- Supergirl Is a Super-Bummer Slate Magazine
- ‘Supergirl’ Review: This Glass Ceiling Is Made of Kryptonite The New York Times
- ‘Supergirl’ Review: DC’s Disaffected Heroine WSJ
- Is 'Supergirl' worth watching? Critics praise 'terrific' Milly Alcock but are split on the movie. Yahoo
- 'Supergirl' review: Better than the comic, but not DC's best Mashable
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
29
Time Saved
10 min
vs 11 min read
Condensed
97%
2,088 → 69 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slate Magazine