Judge Dismisses Morgan Carey's $20M Defamation Suit Against Mariah Over Memoir

3 min read
Source: The Guardian
Judge Dismisses Morgan Carey's $20M Defamation Suit Against Mariah Over Memoir
Photo: The Guardian
TL;DR

A New York judge dismissed Morgan Carey's defamation lawsuit against his sister Mariah Carey, ruling he failed to prove 'actual malice' regarding claims in her 2020 memoir. The decision ends a five-year legal dispute, though Morgan's attorney plans to appeal.

Key points

  • Judge Leslie Stroth dismissed Morgan Carey's lawsuit on October 19, 2026, finding he did not prove Mariah knew her statements were false.
  • The case stemmed from Mariah's 2020 memoir, 'The Meaning of Mariah Carey,' which described Morgan as a drug dealer and 'ex-brother.'
  • Morgan sought over $20 million in damages, claiming the book ruined his career and reputation.
  • Mariah's lawyer called the ruling a victory for authors speaking on matters of public interest.
  • Morgan's attorney, Richard Roth, stated he intends to appeal the decision to the First Department.

Background

The legal battle began in 2021, shortly after Mariah Carey published her memoir. Morgan Carey sued his sister, alleging the book contained false and defamatory statements about his character and criminal history. In 2022, Judge Barbara Jaffe dismissed most of the claims but allowed a few to proceed. The case was later reassigned to Judge Leslie Stroth, who issued the final dismissal in October 2026. Mariah's sister Alison Carey also filed a separate defamation suit in 2021 but did not pursue it; she died in 2024.

How outlets are covering it

The Guardian and Billboard emphasize the legal standard of 'actual malice' and Mariah's lawyer's statement that the ruling protects authors on public interest issues. Fox News highlights Morgan's claims that Mariah 'weaponized' family tragedies for commercial gain and his argument that she failed to fact-check statements. The Times of India notes the $20 million figure refers to claimed damages, not an award, and details Morgan's argument that the ruling ignored prior decisions. All sources agree the case is not fully closed due to the planned appeal.

Why it matters

The ruling reinforces the high legal bar for defamation claims against public figures in the US, requiring proof of 'actual malice.' It sets a precedent for memoirs and personal accounts involving public figures, balancing freedom of expression against reputational harm. The case also highlights the complexities of family disputes involving public figures and the legal challenges of proving defamation in such contexts.

What to watch

Morgan Carey's attorney, Richard Roth, has stated he will appeal the dismissal to the First Department. The appeal could extend the legal dispute, which began in 2021. Mariah Carey's legal team has expressed satisfaction with the ruling, but the case may continue through the appeals process.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on The Guardian