Simon Stephenson Sues Alexander Payne for Copyright Infringement Over 'The Holdovers'
Simon Stephenson, the screenwriter behind 'Luca' and 'Paddington 2', has filed a federal lawsuit against director Alexander Payne and others, alleging that the Oscar-winning film 'The Holdovers' plagiarized his 2013 screenplay 'Frisco'. The complaint claims Payne read 'Frisco' in 2013 and 2019 before collaborating with David Hemingson, resulting in a film that shares structural and dialogue elements with the unproduced script. Stephenson seeks damages and an injunction against further distribution of the film, which grossed approximately $46 million and received five Academy Award nominations, including one for best screenplay. While Payne has acknowledged drawing from the 1935 French film 'Merlusse', the lawsuit argues that the specific architecture and stylistic quirks of 'The Holdovers' originate from 'Frisco'. This case highlights a broader trend in copyright litigation, where courts are increasingly reluctant to dismiss claims early, though plaintiffs still face a high burden of proof to establish substantial similarity beyond general ideas.
Key points
- Simon Stephenson filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in California federal court against Alexander Payne, David Hemingson, and production entities, claiming 'The Holdovers' copied his 2013 screenplay 'Frisco'.
- The complaint alleges Payne read 'Frisco' in 2013 and 2019, noting that both scripts feature curmudgeonly adults supervising teenagers, with 'Frisco' focusing on a pediatrician and 'The Holdovers' on a boarding school teacher.
- Stephenson points to specific similarities, including the use of 'Day 1' story cards with the phrase 'Under Black' and a character's reference to a 'medical conference', which he claims are unique to 'Frisco'.
- The lawsuit follows a 2024 dispute where Stephenson took the issue to the Writers Guild of America, which ruled the matter non-arbitrable, leading to this federal action.
- While Payne has cited the 1935 film 'Merlusse' as an inspiration, the complaint argues that the detailed plot structure and stylistic habits in 'The Holdovers' derive from 'Frisco', not just general concepts.
Background
This lawsuit emerges amid a recent shift in copyright litigation, where federal appeals courts have become more cautious about dismissing cases early, allowing more claims to proceed to trial. Previous high-profile cases, such as those involving 'Servant' and 'Moana', ended in defense verdicts, but the 'Shape of Water' case resulted in a settlement after a 2020 appeals court ruling. 'The Holdovers' was a commercial and critical success, grossing roughly $46 million and securing five Academy Award nominations, including best screenplay, before its distribution on Netflix.
Why it matters
The case tests the boundaries of copyright protection for screenplays, specifically whether stylistic quirks and structural elements constitute infringement when general ideas are shared. It also reflects the increasing willingness of established writers to pursue legal action against prominent directors, potentially influencing how studios and producers vet original content and handle unproduced scripts in the future.
What to watch
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and a court order to bar further exploitation of 'The Holdovers'. The outcome will depend on whether a jury finds substantial similarity in the expression of ideas, a high legal bar. The case may also influence how the Writers Guild of America and other industry bodies handle disputes involving potential plagiarism.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The Hollywood Reporter