Diddy appeals conviction, arguing his explicit encounters were protected by the First Amendment

1 min read
Source: Yahoo
Diddy appeals conviction, arguing his explicit encounters were protected by the First Amendment
Photo: Yahoo
TL;DR Summary

Lawyers for Sean “Diddy” Combs went before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to overturn his 50‑month Mann Act sentence, arguing the trial judge erred by relying on evidence of fraud and sexual coercion that a jury had acquitted and by treating his ‘freak offs’ recordings as protected by the First Amendment. Prosecutors countered that the challenged conduct was still relevant to the prostitution counts for which Combs was convicted. The court could uphold, order a new sentencing hearing, or overturn the conviction entirely; Combs, who is imprisoned at Fort Dix, has had his release date shuffled and the appeal leaves his status unresolved.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

8

Time Saved

36 min

vs 37 min read

Condensed

99%

7,357107 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on Yahoo