Sussexes Reject 'Private Citizen' Label as Charles and William Unite on Royal Status

3 min read
Source: Fox News
Sussexes Reject 'Private Citizen' Label as Charles and William Unite on Royal Status
Photo: Fox News
TL;DR

King Charles III has formally designated Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as 'private citizens' rather than working royals, a move the couple is actively contesting. While the monarch’s letter clarifies they do not represent the crown, Harry and Meghan argue they remain public figures. Prince William has aligned with his father, refusing any relationship with his brother, while experts debate the practicality of privacy for such high-profile individuals.

Key points

  • King Charles issued a letter on September 7, 2026, via the Lord Chamberlain, stating Harry and Meghan are 'akin to private citizens' and do not represent the monarchy.
  • Sources close to the Sussexes told People magazine that they are 'public figures' and that living a normal private life is 'not realistic' given their fame.
  • Prince William and King Charles are 'completely united' in their stance that the Sussexes do not represent the royal family, according to royal author Russell Myers.
  • Prince William has 'washed his hands' of his brother, planning to have no relationship with Harry in any capacity, while Charles has maintained contact with him.
  • The couple faces security concerns, including a leaked phone number and school withdrawal for their children, which they argue highlights the risks of their status.

Background

This dispute follows the couple's return to the UK after six years in California. Previous coverage noted that the Sussexes were surprised by the wording of Charles's letter and that the timing coincided with discussions regarding police protection. The couple has been attempting to carve out independent roles since stepping down from royal duties in 2020.

How outlets are covering it

Fox News highlights the conflict between the Sussexes' demand for privacy and their continued engagement with the 'publicity machine,' citing expert Kinsey Schofield who argues they cannot feed the media and then complain about a lack of privacy. Conversely, Page Six emphasizes the unified front between King Charles and Prince William, noting that while Charles has spoken to Harry, William has severed all ties. Royal commentator Ian Pelham Turner, cited by Fox News, criticizes Charles for 'disenfranchising' his son and failing to provide adequate security, contrasting with the palace's view that the label is a necessary clarification to prevent public confusion.

Why it matters

The formal designation of 'private citizen' strips Harry and Meghan of official royal status and associated protections, forcing them to navigate security and public perception independently. This move solidifies the rift within the royal family, as Prince William’s refusal to engage with his brother signals a permanent division. The dispute also raises questions about the practicality of privacy for high-profile individuals and the boundaries of royal representation in the 21st century.

What to watch

The future of the Sussexes' status remains uncertain, with experts describing the situation as a 'total mess.' The couple may continue to face security challenges and public scrutiny as they attempt to establish a life in the UK without royal endorsement. The palace is expected to maintain its stance that the Sussexes do not represent the crown, while the couple may continue to push back on the 'private citizen' label through media channels.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on Fox News