Early-life sugar exposure linked to lower cancer risk and slower aging
TL;DR
A study analyzing data from about 64,000 Britons born between 1951 and 1956 finds that longer exposure to Britain's sugar rationing during the first 1,000 days (conception through age 2) is associated with a lower risk of several cancers later in life— notably liver cancer, which dropped ~69%—and with indicators of slower cellular ageing (longer telomeres, lower granzyme B). Interestingly, those exposed to rationing in early life also tended to consume less sugar and have healthier diets in adulthood, suggesting both biological and behavioral mechanisms. The results highlight the lasting impact of early nutrition on long-term health but do not endorse sugar rationing today.
- Babies born under sugar rationing grew into adults with lower cancer risk The Conversation
- Scaremongering about sugar is pushing out the actual science The Grocer
- Sugar restriction in first 1,000 days from conception linked to lower risk for dementia Medical Xpress
- It’s Never Too Early to Cut Down on Sugar Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation
- Cutting sugar during pregnancy, early childhood protects brain decades later? Neurologist Dr Sudhir Kumar explains Hindustan Times
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The Conversation