Holdout juror scrolled through his phone, couldn’t justify stance in Clancy deliberations

TL;DR Summary
Juror Nick Dargie says a holdout in Lindsay Clancy’s trial scrolled his phone, couldn’t back up his stance with evidence, and even appeared to mimic Clancy strangling her children. Dargie voted not guilty by reason of insanity, noting the holdout’s lack of engagement helped produce a mistrial. He also referenced the Massachusetts burden of proof for criminal responsibility and suggested retrial could yield a different outcome, though the DA has not announced next steps.
- Lindsay Clancy juror says holdout scrolled his phone during deliberations and couldn’t back up his stance Boston.com
- Clancy holdout juror mimicked strangling during deliberations, juror claims ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
- Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer asks the judge to spare her a second trial for killing her children ABC7 Los Angeles
- ‘We felt defeated’: Lindsay Clancy juror provides new details about the lone holdout NBC News
- Lone holdout in Lindsay Clancy trial demonstrated the killings during deliberations, fellow juror says Fox News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
4
Time Saved
5 min
vs 6 min read
Condensed
93%
1,053 → 74 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Boston.com