Supreme Court's Controversial Rulings on Online Harassment and Stalking Victims

The Supreme Court's recent ruling that online harassment is protected by the First Amendment has sparked outrage among victims and advocates. The decision, which requires prosecutors to prove that a defendant acted recklessly and disregarded a substantial risk of their communications being viewed as threatening violence, has been criticized for its lack of understanding of the terror victims of online harassment face. Experts warn that the ruling could discourage tech companies from cracking down on harassing posts and may have implications for free speech. Victims and advocates argue that the decision further adds to the difficulties faced by victims and fails to take online abuse seriously.
- Supreme Court ruling on online harassment angers victims, advocates The Washington Post
- Supreme Court online stalking ruling could impact stalking victims, like Oahu woman KITV
- SCOTUS increasing 'true threat' burden of proof to convict could impact Lee County 10-year-old's trial Wink News
- Supreme Court Prioritizes a Stalker’s Free Speech Over His Victim’s Bloomberg
- Supreme Court backs man who sent female musician flood of unwanted messages KSL.com
Reading Insights
0
12
4 min
vs 5 min read
89%
989 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post