Heated Arguments and Shouting Erupt in Trump's Mar-a-Lago Case Hearing
TL;DR
Walt Nauta's defense team seeks to modify a motion to dismiss the indictment in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, arguing that special counsel Jack Smith has shifted the statutory authority for count 38, which pertains to Trump, not Nauta. The defense claims this change undermines the government's case, asserting that causing someone to make "literally-true" statements does not constitute a federal crime.
- Defense filing in Mar-a-Lago case says the government cannot criminalize ‘literally-true’ statements even if they misled FBI agents Law & Crime
- 'He lives in his little silo,' former prosecutor on why Donald Trump carries around stacks of papers MSNBC
- Former US district judge says Judge Cannon has ‘insecurity’ with Trump case CNN
- 'Garbage argument': Hearing in Trump's classified docs case gets heated POLITICO
- Aileen Cannon's Trump Hearing Suddenly Erupts Into Shouting Newsweek
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Law & Crime