DOJ Subpoenas California Election Staff Amid Ballot Count Dispute
The U.S. Justice Department has issued grand jury subpoenas to Los Angeles County election officials, demanding documents related to federal allegations of noncitizen voting. This move escalates tensions ahead of the November midterms, following a federal judge's rejection of the administration's bid to segregate 20,000 ballots. While the DOJ frames this as a criminal probe into voter fraud, California officials and courts characterize it as an attempt to intimidate local administrators and disrupt the counting process.
Key points
- Subpoenas sent Oct. 21 and 24 to LA County Registrar-Recorder employees, requiring court appearance on Nov. 4.
- DOJ seeks records regarding July and October letters warning officials of 'aiders and abettors' liability for counting flagged ballots.
- Judge David O. Carter rejected the DOJ's request to segregate 20,000 ballots, citing the National Voter Registration Act and logistical impossibility.
- Carter appointed special master Daniel B. Garrie to evaluate the reliability of the federal list of alleged noncitizens.
- The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declined to intervene, with two judges indicating they would not support setting aside ballots this close to the election.
Background
This escalation follows a broader pattern of federal scrutiny of local elections, including similar subpoenas in Alaska and over 100 subpoenas across 13 states. The current dispute centers on a list of 20,000 names from California's 23 million voters, a fraction that studies suggest is unlikely to represent widespread noncitizen voting. The timeline is critical, as the Nov. 4 subpoena deadline falls the day after the election, and the Dec. 3 certification deadline is approaching.
How outlets are covering it
AP and The New York Times emphasize the criminal nature of the investigation and the pressure on local officials, noting that the DOJ has charged over two dozen foreign nationals in California. NPR highlights the specific warnings sent to officials that refusing to cooperate could make them 'aiders and abettors' of a federal crime. The Guardian focuses on the political context, noting the midterms are expected to be major losses for the president's party, and quotes Judge Carter's strong language about the federal government coercing state procedures. All sources agree that the DOJ's list is disputed and that the timing is highly contentious.
Why it matters
The subpoenas signal a potential shift from civil litigation to criminal prosecution of election administrators, setting a precedent for federal interference in state election processes. The outcome of the special master's review and the 9th Circuit's stance will determine whether the 20,000 ballots are counted, directly impacting the integrity of the midterm results in a key Democratic state.
What to watch
The special master, Daniel B. Garrie, will develop a factual record for Judge Carter, who is scheduled to rule on a preliminary injunction after a Nov. 13 evidentiary hearing. The 9th Circuit may revisit the case if the lower court's ruling changes the legal landscape, but current indications suggest the appeals court will not intervene before the election.
- Justice Department subpoenas California officials in escalation of its scrutiny of elections AP News
- Trump Administration Pressures California With Expanded Voter Fraud Investigation The New York Times
- Justice Department issues subpoenas to California election workers NPR
- Trump administration opens criminal investigation over alleged noncitizen voting in California The Guardian
- Judge says Trump bid to set aside California ballots would ‘wreak havoc’ on democracy Reuters
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on AP News