Skepticism Grows Over Comey Seashell Indictment
TL;DR Summary
Analysts question the viability of a second indictment against James Comey over an Instagram seashell display, arguing prosecutors must prove true intent to harm the president and that First Amendment protections, plus the ambiguity of symbols, could undermine a conviction, suggesting the case may follow the earlier one toward dismissal.
- Some experts skeptical of second Comey indictment over seashell post BBC
- '86 it': Restaurant workers say the term at the center of James Comey's indictment is 'everyday lingo' NBC News
- Former FBI Director James Comey surrenders and appears in court over alleged threat against Trump CNN
- Opinion | Comey and Kimmel: Seashells and a Joke The New York Times
- What does '86 47′ mean? The seashell numbers behind Comey's indictment, explained NBC4 Washington
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
5 min
vs 6 min read
Condensed
95%
1,082 → 50 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on BBC