Stevens' Last-Minute Endorsement of Rogers Triggers Democratic Purge Calls
Rep. Haley Stevens endorsed Republican Mike Rogers for the Michigan Senate on Sunday, two days before the election, after a public feud with Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed. The move triggered immediate resignations from her staff, condemnation from national Democratic leaders, and calls to remove her from the House caucus. Meanwhile, Sen. Roger Marshall faces a new class-action lawsuit over medical debt collection practices.
Key points
- Stevens endorsed Rogers after El-Sayed excluded her from campaign events and refused to condemn a third-party ad linking Israel to grocery prices.
- Stevens' chief of staff and other aides resigned, stating they were 'shocked and heartbroken' and would support El-Sayed.
- Six House Democrats privately urged leadership to remove Stevens from the caucus, with Rep. Marc Veasey calling the move 'insane.'
- Sen. Chuck Schumer called the endorsement a 'despicable betrayal,' while Trump praised Stevens for her 'bravery.'
- A former patient filed a class-action lawsuit against Sen. Roger Marshall, alleging illegal interest rates on medical debt.
Background
Stevens lost the Michigan Democratic primary to El-Sayed in August and had initially endorsed him. The current dispute stems from El-Sayed's refusal to disavow an ad that Stevens deemed antisemitic. This follows earlier tensions where El-Sayed barred Stevens from final rallies to maintain party unity ahead of the November 3 vote.
How outlets are covering it
POLITICO reports that Stevens told reporters she is 'still very much a Democrat' and that Rogers made no promises, framing her decision as a personal choice after being excluded by El-Sayed. The New York Times and KWCH focus on the legal fallout for Marshall, highlighting a new lawsuit alleging he charged illegal 18% interest on a $3,000 bill. While POLITICO emphasizes the internal Democratic purge efforts, national leaders like Schumer and Trump offer starkly different interpretations of Stevens' loyalty, with Schumer condemning the betrayal and Trump praising her support for Rogers.
Why it matters
The endorsement threatens to fracture the Democratic coalition in Michigan, a pivotal state for Senate control. The potential removal of Stevens from the House caucus could impact the lame duck session, where Republicans hold a razor-thin majority. Simultaneously, the Marshall lawsuit adds to a narrative of ethical scrutiny in a tight Kansas race, potentially influencing undecided voters in a state that has not elected a Democratic senator since 1932.
What to watch
Democrats are expected to decide on Stevens' caucus status after the November 3 election. The Marshall lawsuit will proceed in Barton County District Court. El-Sayed and Rogers will continue campaigning in Michigan, with Democrats hoping to minimize the impact of the Stevens controversy through a strong performance on election day.
- 2026 Midterm Elections, Nov. 1 Politico
- Marshall’s closing message in Kansas is a defense of his lawsuits against patients The Washington Post
- Former Patient Files Class-Action Lawsuit Against Senator Marshall The New York Times
- Former patient suing Sen. Roger Marshall for debt arrest KWCH
- Marshall sued for charging ‘callous and predatory’ 18% interest rate on medical debt in Kansas Kansas Reflector
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Politico