Supreme Court strengthens First Amendment protections for online threats.

The Supreme Court has raised the bar for prosecuting threats under the First Amendment, ruling that prosecutors must demonstrate that a defendant who made a threat acted recklessly to establish that the speech is a "true threat" and thus no longer covered by the First Amendment. The case arose from hundreds of Facebook messages Billy Counterman sent to singer-songwriter Coles Whalen between 2014 and 2016. Counterman was convicted of a crime after sending numerous threatening messages to Whalen, but the Supreme Court wiped away a Colorado Court of Appeals' ruling that upheld the conviction and sent the case back for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
- Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment CBS News
- Supreme Court says a conviction for online threats violated 1st Amendment The Washington Post
- US Supreme Court backs man who sent female musician flood of unwanted messages Yahoo News
- Supreme Court Puts First Amendment Limits on Laws Banning Online Threats The New York Times
- U.S. Supreme Court, in case out of Colorado, issues ruling making it tougher to convict someone who makes a threat The Colorado Sun
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
4
4 min
vs 5 min read
88%
901 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CBS News