Trump's Ballot Eligibility and Legal Battle: Insights from Constitutional Scholars and Colorado Courts

The legal battle continues over whether former President Trump should be disqualified from the ballot in Colorado based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars individuals who have engaged in an insurrection or aided the Constitution's enemies from holding future office. A Colorado district judge ruled that Trump did engage in an insurrection but stated that the clause doesn't apply to the presidency. Both Trump and the plaintiffs have filed appeals. Constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe argues that exempting the presidency from the 14th Amendment would contradict the Constitution's intent and potentially lead to a dictatorship. The case may ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Constitutional scholar discusses Trump's ballot eligibility PBS NewsHour
- Colorado Supreme Court will hear appeal of ruling that Trump can stay on ballot despite insurrection Yahoo News
- Constitutional scholar discusses legal battle surrounding Trump's ballot eligibility PBS NewsHour
- A Colorado court makes it official: Trump is an insurrectionist The Hill
- The Bizarre Reason a Colorado Judge Didn't Disqualify Trump From Running in 2024 The New Republic
Reading Insights
0
11
4 min
vs 5 min read
87%
843 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on PBS NewsHour