"Trump's Legal Maneuvers: From Immunity Claims to Intimidation Tactics"
TL;DR
Former President Trump's lawyer defended the immunity argument made by a Trump attorney during a hearing, stating that Trump "didn't kill anyone" and should have immunity from prosecution for election interference charges. The attorney's hypothetical scenario of the president ordering an assassination was met with criticism, with opposing legal teams and a three-judge panel pushing back against the notion of broad immunity for such actions.
Topics:nationpolitics#assassination-comment#dc-circuit-court#immunity-argument#legal-defense#politics#trump
- Trump lawyer goes on defense after assassination comment: 'He didn't kill anyone' Yahoo News
- Takeaways from the appeals court hearing on Donald Trump’s immunity claims CNN
- Opinion: Trump's attempt to intimidate a federal appeals court could ensure his defeat Yahoo News
- Trump’s immunity appeal was both laughable and frightening The Hill
- Trump and his enablers have been moving towards ‘absolute immunity’ all along | Opinion Kansas City Star
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Yahoo News