Trump's Slur Against South Carolina Candidate Sparks Bipartisan Condemnation

2 min read
Source: NBC News
Trump's Slur Against South Carolina Candidate Sparks Bipartisan Condemnation
Photo: NBC News
TL;DR

President Trump used an anti-transgender slur to attack Democratic Senate candidate Annie Andrews in South Carolina, prompting bipartisan criticism. Andrews, a pediatrician who is not transgender, responded by focusing on cost-of-living issues. The race, previously seen as solidly Republican, has shifted toward 'Likely Republican' due to recent developments.

Key points

  • Trump referred to Annie Andrews as 'trannie' in a Truth Social post, stating she is 'not for South Carolina.'
  • Andrews, a pediatrician and mother of three, is not transgender and responded by emphasizing her focus on lowering costs for families.
  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the remarks 'despicable,' while former Gov. David Beasley criticized the president's approach as 'abhorrent.'
  • The Human Rights Campaign condemned the remarks, calling them 'sad, disgusting, pathetic diatribes' from a 'lame duck president.'
  • The Cook Political Report recently shifted the race from 'Solid Republican' to 'Likely Republican,' indicating a potential shift in the political landscape.

Background

Darline Graham, a political newcomer, won the Republican primary in a runoff against Rep. Ralph Norman by nearly 5 percentage points, heavily relying on Trump's endorsement. Norman later criticized Trump's involvement in the race, calling it 'shocking.' The White House did not comment on the slur, referring NBC News to Trump's social media post.

How outlets are covering it

NBC News and CNN both reported on Trump's use of the slur, with NBC News providing more detail on Andrews' response and the reactions from political figures. CNN's report focused on the broader implications of the slur and the reactions from various stakeholders. Both outlets highlighted the bipartisan condemnation of the remarks, with Schumer and Beasley both criticizing Trump's approach. The Human Rights Campaign's condemnation was also noted by both outlets, emphasizing the 'lame duck' status of the president.

Why it matters

The use of a slur by the president in a high-profile race could have significant implications for voter sentiment and the outcome of the election. The shift in the Cook Political Report rating suggests that the race may be more competitive than previously thought, potentially impacting the broader political landscape in South Carolina and beyond.

What to watch

The race will likely continue to be a focal point in the upcoming midterms, with both campaigns focusing on cost-of-living issues and the impact of Trump's endorsement. The reactions from political figures and advocacy groups may influence voter sentiment and turnout in the state.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on NBC News