Clancy holdout juror’s spokesperson claims other jurors used phones during deliberations

The spokesperson for Michael Desronvil, the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial, claims other jurors used cellphones during deliberations. This comes after Clancy’s attorney requested a review of Desronvil’s phone records. The dispute highlights tensions over jury conduct following the mistrial.
Key points
- Desronvil’s spokesperson, Ray Marcel, stated that several jurors used phones and posted on social media during the seven days of deliberations.
- Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, filed a motion to investigate Desronvil’s phone records and his truthfulness during jury selection.
- Another defense attorney, Martin Weinberg, asked the judge to dismiss the case entirely, arguing the judge should have replaced Desronvil with an alternate juror instead of declaring a mistrial.
- Desronvil was the only juror who refused to find Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, leading to a deadlocked jury and a mistrial on September 4.
- Marcel argued that if Desronvil’s phone records are reviewed, the same standard should apply to all jurors.
Background
The Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial after a week of deliberations, with 11 of 12 jurors favoring a not-guilty-by-insanity verdict due to postpartum psychosis. Desronvil, the lone holdout, faced public backlash and death threats, as noted in previous coverage. The case centers on whether Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children in 2023.
How outlets are covering it
The New York Post emphasizes Desronvil’s defense, highlighting Marcel’s claims that other jurors also used phones and posted on social media, suggesting a double standard in the investigation. CNN focuses on the legal motions, detailing Reddington’s request to investigate Desronvil’s phone use and truthfulness, and Weinberg’s argument for case dismissal. Both outlets agree on the core facts of the mistrial and the motions but differ in emphasis: the Post centers on the retaliation and broader jury conduct, while CNN centers on the procedural and legal challenges.
Why it matters
The dispute over jury conduct and phone use raises questions about the integrity of the trial process and the fairness of the mistrial. It could influence whether prosecutors retry Clancy or if the case is dismissed, impacting the outcome of a high-profile murder trial involving a mother accused of killing her children.
What to watch
Judge William Sullivan must decide whether to order the phone records review and whether to dismiss the case or allow a retrial. Prosecutors have not yet announced their decision on retrying Clancy, with a hearing scheduled for September 29.
- Lindsay Clancy holdout juror Michael Desronvil claims fellow jurors used cellphones during deliberations: report New York Post
- Lindsay Clancy holdout juror's attorney says defense's motion for judge to question him 'dangerous' ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
- Lindsay Clancy’s attorney asks judge to investigate the lone juror who wanted to convict her CNN
- Lindsay Clancy judge indefinitely seals jury pool list, questionnaires The Boston Globe
- Lindsay Clancy’s Defense Lawyer Asks Judge to Investigate Holdout Juror After Mistrial The New York Times
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on New York Post