The ICC's Fitness Vote: Can Its Prosecutor Lead Again?

TL;DR Summary
Ahead of Friday’s Assembly of States Parties vote on whether ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan should be removed, the authors argue the decision is about the Office’s capacity to function under Article 46, not a criminal trial. They acknowledge procedural flaws but insist the fitness question must be decided on the total record—including Khan’s prolonged absence, bar suspension, and staff concerns about trust and retaliation—rather than the process alone. They call for independent, pre-established mechanisms for investigating senior officials and conclude Khan should not resume duties, urging governance reform as the immediate priority.
- Before the Assembly: The Removal Vote and the Question of Fitness for Office Just Security
- Exclusive: Lawyer goes public with sexual misconduct claims against ICC chief prosecutor. He denies the allegations CNN
- ICC prosecutor Karim Khan faces removal vote: What’s the case about? Al Jazeera
- International Criminal Court members to vote on dismissing prosecutor Khan Reuters
- ICC staffer talks publicly about alleged sexual abuse by chief prosecutor Karim Khan The Guardian
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
19 min
vs 20 min read
Condensed
98%
3,826 → 92 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Just Security