Michigan Hockey Players Sue Over Decades of Ritualized Sexual Abuse
Sixteen former University of Michigan hockey players have filed a federal lawsuit alleging that they were subjected to ritualized sexual abuse and hazing between 1984 and 2001. The suit claims that head coach Red Berenson and other staff members were aware of the misconduct, which included forced genital shaving and other degrading acts, but failed to intervene. While the university denies responsibility, citing its early adoption of anti-hazing policies, the plaintiffs argue that the abuse was a required part of team membership. The legal action stems from conversations among former teammates in 2024 and seeks damages as well as mandatory hazing-prevention training for all student athletes.
Key points
- A federal lawsuit filed in Detroit alleges that 16 former Michigan hockey players were sexually abused and hazed between 1984 and 2001.
- The complaint describes specific acts, including forced shaving of genitals, consumption of live fish, and excessive alcohol intake, characterizing the abuse as 'ritualized' and 'sadistic.'
- Plaintiffs accuse former head coach Red Berenson of knowing about the abuse and coercing players to participate by invoking team loyalty, despite some players objecting.
- The University of Michigan denies liability, stating that any misconduct violated its anti-hazing policy, which it adopted in 1982, making it one of the first in the nation to do so.
- The lawsuit seeks financial damages and requires the university to implement hazing-prevention training for all athletes, potentially facing a statute of limitations defense similar to a 2020 case involving a sports doctor.
Background
This case follows a 2020 settlement in which the University of Michigan paid $490 million to resolve claims by over 1,000 former athletes regarding sexual misconduct by a campus sports doctor. That previous case also involved allegations of misconduct occurring decades prior, leading the university to argue that the current plaintiffs waited too long to file. The current lawsuit emerged from informal discussions among former teammates in 2024, highlighting a pattern of delayed reporting in collegiate sports abuse cases.
Why it matters
This lawsuit highlights ongoing challenges in addressing historical sexual misconduct in collegiate sports and tests the limits of statutes of limitations in such cases. It also underscores the tension between institutional claims of early policy adoption and the alleged reality of normalized abusive culture within high-profile athletic programs. The outcome may influence how universities handle historical complaints and the implementation of preventive training across all sports.
What to watch
The case will proceed through federal court in Detroit, where the university may argue that the claims are time-barred. The university is expected to defend its position that the alleged acts violated its existing policies, while plaintiffs will seek to prove that the coaching staff actively encouraged or ignored the abuse. The outcome could set a precedent for handling historical sexual hazing claims in collegiate athletics.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on NBC News