Court-ordered press access stalls as White House delays credential restoration

A federal judge ordered the White House to restore press credentials for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico within 14 days, but the outlets were initially denied entry on Thursday. The administration delayed badge return until late morning, causing confusion during President Trump's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The case continues with a deadline for a preliminary injunction on September 28.
Key points
- Judge Timothy J. Kelly granted a temporary restraining order on Thursday, ruling the administration likely violated the outlets' Fifth Amendment due process rights.
- Despite the order, reporters from the three outlets were denied entry and had credentials confiscated in the morning, prompting an urgent request for a hearing.
- White House press operations director Micah Stopperich stated credentials were available for pickup starting at 9:55 am ET, hours after the order was issued.
- The Justice Department argued the ban should remain during Xi's visit for national security reasons, a claim Kelly dismissed as a post-hoc justification.
- Kelly set a September 28 deadline for the outlets to file for a preliminary injunction, noting he intends to rule expeditiously.
Background
This dispute follows President Trump's ban of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House on September 20, 2026, citing their 'fake news' reporting. The outlets filed a First Amendment lawsuit on September 21, and the Justice Department defended the ban on national security grounds on September 23. Major networks suspended pool coverage in solidarity, and Trump confronted a CNN reporter at the United Nations on September 23.
How outlets are covering it
Axios and Politico reported that reporters were denied entry and had credentials confiscated in the morning despite the judge's order, highlighting a conflict between the court ruling and administration compliance. The Washington Post focused on the judge's order and the legal arguments, noting Kelly's dismissal of the national security justification. All sources agreed on the judge's ruling but differed in emphasis: Axios and Politico focused on the immediate access issues, while the Washington Post focused on the legal proceedings and the judge's reasoning.
Why it matters
The case tests the limits of press access and First Amendment rights in the White House, with potential implications for future media bans and the balance of power between the executive branch and the press.
What to watch
The outlets must file for a preliminary injunction by September 28, and the judge intends to rule expeditiously. The administration may appeal the ruling after the 14-day period, and the First Amendment claims are likely to be further litigated.
- White House reinstates access for banned reporters Axios
- Reporters Return to the White House, but TV Standoff Persists The New York Times
- 3 US news outlets return to White House after judge orders Trump to lift ban AP News
- POLITICO, CNN, MS NOW barred from White House after court ruling restoring access Politico
- Read the judge’s order blocking Trump’s media ban The Washington Post
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Axios