Trump Weighs Livestreaming Hasan Execution Amid Bipartisan Backlash

President Trump is privately reconsidering the plan to livestream the firing-squad execution of Nidal Hasan, scheduled for December 3. While Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed the broadcast as a deterrent, Trump has expressed doubts to confidants, citing concerns about creating a martyr. The decision remains pending as the administration faces intense criticism from lawmakers, religious leaders, and international observers.
Key points
- Trump told confidants the livestream 'might not happen,' signaling a shift from his initial public approval of the broadcast.
- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the plan on Oct. 8, arguing that public visibility would demonstrate serious consequences for terrorism.
- Vice President JD Vance has privately signaled skepticism, stating he would not watch the execution, highlighting a rift with Hegseth.
- DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin defended the plan on Sunday, rejecting claims that it poses national security risks or fuels radicalization.
- Pope Leo XIV and Vatican officials condemned the broadcast as a 'spectacle' that violates human dignity, while U.S. bishops called it 'barbaric.'
Background
Nidal Hasan, a former Army major, was convicted of killing 13 people and injuring 32 others in a 2009 shooting at Fort Hood, Texas. His execution on Dec. 3 would be the first U.S. military execution by firing squad since 1945 and the first public execution in nearly a century. Previous archive coverage noted that the plan sparked immediate bipartisan opposition and international concern, with Vance expressing doubts as early as Oct. 9.
How outlets are covering it
Axios reports that Trump is receiving 'negative input' from a bipartisan chorus of lawmakers and advisers, leading him to question the broadcast. While Hegseth and DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin argue the livestream is a necessary deterrent and poses no elevated risk, critics like Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Mark Warner warn it could fuel radicalization and grant Hasan unwanted notoriety. The Washington Post’s opinion section frames the move as 'barbaric,' while Vatican officials, including Pope Leo XIV, condemn it as an attack on human dignity. The disagreement highlights a deep internal rift between Hegseth and Vance, who have clashed on other issues including military force in the Middle East.
Why it matters
The decision sets a potential precedent for public executions in the U.S., a practice discontinued in the 1930s. It tests the limits of executive authority over military justice and raises questions about the intersection of national security, religious ethics, and political optics in the Trump administration.
What to watch
Trump is expected to make a final decision on the livestream before the December 3 execution date. The administration is currently weighing the political fallout against the desire to punish Hasan, with no final announcement yet made.
- Trump privately expresses doubts about livestreaming execution Axios
- US Homeland Security defends Nidal Hasan livestream execution bid BBC
- Fort Hood shooter’s execution to be livestreamed FOX 5 DC
- Opinion | Fill the government with barbarians, you get barbaric government The Washington Post
- Rejection of streamed execution unites Australia — but sets collision course with Trump Politico
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Axios