Strickland Edges Chimaev in UFC 328: Not a Robbery, Just a Close Split
TL;DR Summary
A Robbery Review of UFC 328’s Strickland vs. Chimaev concludes the split-decision win for Strickland was controversial yet not a robbery; Strickland outlanded Chimaev in significant strikes and controlled much of the bout on the feet, while Chimaev had early moments and late pressure. Fans and media were split, but the article maintains the result was legitimate, even if others would score it differently.
- Robbery Review: Sean Strickland vs. Khamzat Chimaev at UFC 328 MMA Fighting
- UFC 328 fight fallout: Best bouts for Sean Strickland, Khamzat Chimaev, Joshua Van and more after Saturday CBS Sports
- As far as UFC champions go, has there ever been a paradox quite like Sean Strickland? Yahoo Sports
- Dana White: ‘I highly doubt we have a new and improved Sean Strickland’ after UFC 328 MMA Fighting
- Sean Strickland: Khamzat Chimaev ‘1000% missed weight’ for UFC 328 MMAWeekly.com
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
4
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
96%
1,676 → 64 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on MMA Fighting