Investigation Links U.S. Precision Strike Missile to Deadly Civilian Casualties in Iran

A new investigation by the conflict monitor Airwars and The Associated Press suggests that U.S. Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) were used in the Iranian city of Lamerd on February 28, 2026, resulting in significant civilian deaths. The report highlights that the weapon’s wide-area pellet dispersion caused damage far beyond its intended target, contradicting claims of pinpoint accuracy. While the U.S. military denies striking Lamerd, experts and open-source evidence point to the PrSM as the likely culprit, raising concerns about its use in populated areas.
Key points
- Airwars and AP found that three missiles struck Lamerd, killing at least 21 civilians, including seven children, with damage extending over 170 meters from the blast sites.
- The PrSM, designed to replace the ATACMS, explodes midair to scatter tens of thousands of dense tungsten pellets, creating a lethal radius much wider than traditional missiles.
- U.S. Central Command denied firing PrSMs at Lamerd, claiming the footage showed an Iranian Hoveyzeh cruise missile, but weapons experts rejected this explanation due to visual discrepancies.
- The Pentagon signed a $4 billion contract with Lockheed Martin to quadruple PrSM production, while the U.K. and Australia have also committed to purchasing the weapon.
- Experts argue the PrSM should be reserved for targets with hard armor or large enemy concentrations, not densely populated civilian areas.
Background
This incident occurs amid escalating U.S.-Iran tensions, including recent strikes on Larak Island and significant damage to U.S. spy infrastructure from Iranian attacks. The PrSM is part of a broader modernization of U.S. missile capabilities, with allies like the U.K. and Australia investing in the system.
Why it matters
The findings raise serious questions about the legality and ethics of using advanced U.S. weapons in populated areas, potentially violating international laws of war. The wide blast radius of the PrSM poses a significant risk to civilian safety, challenging the military’s claims of precision and highlighting the need for stricter use policies.
What to watch
The U.S. military is expected to face increased scrutiny over its use of the PrSM, while Lockheed Martin may need to address concerns about the weapon’s impact radius. International partners may reconsider their procurement decisions if further evidence of civilian harm emerges.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on HuffPost