In-person final reveals AI cheating in Brown economics class, scores drop by half

TL;DR Summary
Brown econ professor Roberto Serrano moved ECON 1170 to take-home midterms and an in-person final to test for AI-assisted cheating. The class swelled to 86; the midterm averaged 96 with 40 perfect scores, but the final’s in-person results among 27 takers averaged 48 (18 dropped, 9 did not attend). Notably, 22 of the 27 final-takers had scored 100 on the midterm. Serrano suspects widespread AI cheating and warns that if cheating becomes normalized, it could erode learning and society. Brown’s GenAI in Teaching and Learning report documents both usage and concerns.
Topics:business#academic-integrity#ai-cheating#brown-university#education#in-person-exam#take-home-exams
- Suspecting AI cheating, Ivy League prof ordered an in-person final; scores fell 50% Ars Technica
- Brown Professor Suspects Most of His Class Used AI to Cheat Inside Higher Ed
- The Ivy League Cheating Scandal No One Wants to Talk About The Chronicle of Higher Education
- Professor suspected AI-powered cheating on take-home midterms, makes finals in-person — only two students scored within 10% of their midterm score Tom's Hardware
- Brown University professor bans take-home exams after mass cheating The College Fix
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
93%
1,244 → 91 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Ars Technica