All articles tagged with #academic integrity
Brown University economist Roberto Serrano warned that AI-driven cheating has made cheating costs nearly zero; a take-home midterm produced unusually high scores, and when the final was moved to in-person, many top-scoring students saw their grades drop, prompting an academic integrity investigation and policy changes such as ending take-home components in future courses.
Brown University economics professor Roberto Serrano suspects a majority of students in his take-home midterm used AI to cheat, prompting him to make the final exam in-person; the midterm averaged about 96% while the final averaged 48.6%, leading to dozens dropping the course or failing. Brown’s handling of the case, including a Standing Committee on the Academic Code and a campus GenAI in teaching and learning initiative, has drawn criticism and highlighted broader questions about AI, detection, and policy in higher education.
A Brown University economics professor, Roberto Serrano, banned take-home exams after a mass cheating incident in his class: about 40 of 86 students earned 100 on a take-home midterm (average around 96), prompting a review. The professor then shifted to an in-person final; of 59 who took the final, 19 failed, with many submitting blank papers. Serrano, who is blind, argues the episode underscores the need for genuine learning and hard work, and he will void the midterm if the final’s grade distribution differs from the midterm’s.
Brown econ professor Roberto Serrano moved ECON 1170 to take-home midterms and an in-person final to test for AI-assisted cheating. The class swelled to 86; the midterm averaged 96 with 40 perfect scores, but the final’s in-person results among 27 takers averaged 48 (18 dropped, 9 did not attend). Notably, 22 of the 27 final-takers had scored 100 on the midterm. Serrano suspects widespread AI cheating and warns that if cheating becomes normalized, it could erode learning and society. Brown’s GenAI in Teaching and Learning report documents both usage and concerns.
GenAI has entered higher education, prompting educators to rethink what should be assessed. A Canadian study with 28 educators finds three boundary areas—prompting, critical thinking, and writing—where assessment rules must evolve. AI can enhance learning and accessibility but also complicates cheating and the spread of misinformation. Rather than blocking AI, campuses should update policies and train staff, adopting five design principles: explicit expectations for how GenAI is allowed to be used; process-focused assessment that values drafts and reflections over final outputs; tasks that require human judgment; developing students' evaluative judgment of AI; and preserving student voice. This signals a shift toward a post-plagiarism world where humans and AI co-create, with AI treated as a catalyst to strengthen integrity and learning.
GPTZero analyzed NeurIPS 2025 papers and found at least 100 fabricated citations across 51 papers that passed peer review, amid a 220% surge in submissions since 2020. The report details fake DOIs and author names, describes 'Vibe Citing' patterns, and notes that NeurIPS and ICLR consider hallucinated citations grounds for rejection or retraction, underscoring reviewer overload and the urgent need for stronger citation verification and fact-checking in AI research.
Teachers are increasingly using AI detection software to identify student use of AI in assignments, but these tools are often unreliable and can produce false positives, leading to concerns about fairness and accuracy. Schools are spending significant money on these tools despite research showing their limitations, and educators are advised to use them as supplementary rather than definitive evidence, focusing instead on teaching students to understand and adapt to AI technology.
A researcher was mistakenly listed as an expert on sex robots in a published paper, which was later retracted due to data inaccuracies and inappropriate search methods, highlighting issues of research misconduct and the importance of accurate bibliometric analysis.
An investigation uncovered over 1,500 research articles linked to a Ukrainian network, Tanu.pro, which is suspected of producing fake or low-quality papers and selling authorships, highlighting a significant issue of scientific misconduct in academic publishing.
A US-developed AI tool analyzed over 15,200 open-access journals, flagging more than 1,400 as potentially fraudulent, with over 1,000 confirmed as predatory, to help improve the integrity of academic publishing. The system uses website pattern analysis and is intended as a prescreening aid for human reviewers, not a replacement, and future accessibility to universities and publishers is planned.
A study from Northwestern University reveals that research fraud in scientific papers is widespread and increasing, with estimates suggesting actual fraud rates could be 10 to 100 times higher than detected. The rise is driven by paper mills, corrupt editors, and the pressure to publish, with the problem exacerbated by online publishing and the potential of generative AI to produce fake research. Experts call for collective action, accountability, and stricter enforcement to combat this growing threat to scientific integrity.
Professor Mark Massaro discusses the challenges of detecting AI-generated essays in education, highlighting signs such as excessive em dashes, lack of indents, perfect grammar with shallow content, absence of drafting history, impersonal writing, leftover prompt inputs, and fake citations, which are used to identify AI-written student papers and address the impact on student development and academic integrity.
A study from the University of East Anglia finds that while ChatGPT can produce grammatically correct and well-structured essays, it lacks the human element of engagement, such as personal commentary and rhetorical questions, which are crucial for persuasive and authentic student writing. The research highlights the importance of critical thinking and suggests using AI as a teaching aid rather than a shortcut, emphasizing that genuine thinking cannot be replicated by algorithms.
A physicist from the University of Rochester, who previously made controversial claims about discovering a room-temperature superconductor, has left the institution. The departure follows scrutiny and skepticism from the scientific community regarding the validity of the research findings.
The college football transfer portal has become more chaotic as players are now allowed to transfer multiple times without restriction, leading to concerns about the diminishing focus on educational values in college athletics. With the emphasis shifting towards player freedom and earning potential, questions arise about the academic integrity of the student-athlete experience and the impact on graduation rates. The NCAA's traditional philosophy of tying athletics to the educational experience is being challenged, and the courts' intervention has reshaped the landscape of college football transfers, raising concerns about the future of academic standards and the student-athlete experience.