ChatGPT Causes Controversy Among Lawyers with Bogus Briefs and Made Up Citations
TL;DR Summary
A Manhattan judge scolded a personal injury lawyer for using ChatGPT to generate a legal brief full of fake cases. The lawyer claimed that he was "duped" by the AI and thought he was using a "super search engine." The judge expressed concern about what happened after the fake cases were cited and will issue a written decision on whether to sanction the lawyer. ChatGPT is an emerging AI technology that operates like a chatbot and can generate detailed answers in seconds, but its answers are often inaccuracies.
Topics:business#artificial-intelligence#chatgpt#legal-brief#legal-technology#personal-injury-lawyers#sanctions
- NYC lawyer scolded for using ChatGPT to write brief full of 'gibberish' New York Daily News
- Lawyers blame ChatGPT for tricking them, U.S. judge sees red | Age of AI & our human future | WION WION
- 'Humiliated' NY lawyer who used ChatGPT for 'bogus' court doc profusely apologizes New York Post
- Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT Faces Penalty for Made Up Citations The New York Times
- Lawyers blame ChatGPT for their citation of bogus past cases Los Angeles Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
9
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
90%
908 → 88 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on New York Daily News