Retirement Confidence Drops as Advisors Stress Math Over Extended Work

Confidence in retirement readiness fell to 61% in 2025, prompting many workers to delay retirement. Financial advisers argue that strategic planning, rather than simply working longer, is essential. Key challenges include navigating Social Security earnings limits, Medicare premium increases, and tax implications from withdrawals. Only 23% of employees have used a financial advisor, creating a significant gap in retirement preparedness despite widespread access to employer plans.
Key points
- Confidence in having enough for retirement dropped 6 percentage points to 61% in 2025, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
- The full retirement age for Social Security is now 67 for those born after 1960, with benefits increasing 8% annually for delays up to age 70.
- Earning over $24,480 before full retirement age in 2026 reduces Social Security benefits by $1 for every $2 earned above the limit.
- Medicare Part B premiums can increase by 40% to 240% based on modified adjusted gross income from two years prior.
- Only 23% of US employees have ever worked with a financial advisor, yet 81% of those who do rate their financial situation as good or excellent.
- Advisers recommend saving 10 to 12 times final annual salary by age 67 and using the 4% rule for withdrawals.
Background
This story follows earlier coverage on the psychological and financial drivers behind delayed retirement, such as the 2026-09-06 article on Steinem and Parton, which highlighted purpose and financial independence as reasons for continued work. The current data provides concrete financial metrics behind that trend, showing that uncertainty, rather than desire, is driving later retirement ages.
How outlets are covering it
USA Today emphasizes the individual math and tax consequences of working in retirement, citing advisers like Rose Faye to explain how earnings affect Social Security and Medicare. InvestmentNews focuses on the systemic gap, highlighting that while 85% of employers offer retirement benefits, only 23% of employees use advisors. InvestmentNews notes that 50% of non-advised employees rate their financial situation as fair or poor, compared to 81% of advised employees. Both sources agree that access to plans is insufficient without personalized strategy, but USA Today details the specific penalties of working, while InvestmentNews highlights the lack of emergency savings programs as a barrier to maintaining retirement funds.
Why it matters
As retirement confidence declines, workers face complex trade-offs between working longer and managing tax liabilities. Without professional guidance, many may inadvertently reduce their Social Security benefits or face higher Medicare costs, undermining their financial security despite having access to employer-sponsored plans.
What to watch
Advisers expect continued pressure on employers to integrate AI-assisted guidance and managed accounts to bridge the advisory gap. Workers are likely to continue delaying retirement targets, with nearly a quarter adjusting their plans in 2025. The adoption of SECURE 2.0 optional provisions, such as emergency savings accounts, may increase as employers seek to prevent retirement account withdrawals.
- More planning and more math, not work, can boost retirement prosperity USA Today
- Employees’ Confidence in Workplace Financial Wellness Support Drops From 74% to 35% CPA Practice Advisor
- Most workers have retirement plans but no retirement strategy InvestmentNews
- Better Wellbeing, Bigger Worries: Alight Research Finds Financial Stress and Healthcare Complexity Continue to Challenge Employees Business Wire
- Americans’ Retirement Plans Take a Hit As Cost of Living Bites Newsweek
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on USA Today