Court weighs whether FCC fines are nonbinding without a jury

TL;DR
During oral arguments, Supreme Court justices questioned AT&T and Verizon’s claim that FCC forfeitures violate the Seventh Amendment, noting carriers could have sought a jury trial by declining to pay and letting enforcement proceed in court. The government argued the forfeiture orders function like indictments and are enforceable only after a jury trial, though justices suggested the penalties may be nonbinding until court review. Even if AT&T and Verizon lose, the case could clarify that FCC fines are nonbinding and require a separate court decision to enforce, affecting how the agency enforces privacy and telecom rules.
- Supreme Court arguments make it clear that FCC fines are "nonbinding" Ars Technica
- Supreme Court Appears to Back F.C.C. Fines Against AT&T and Verizon The New York Times
- Court appears skeptical of right to jury trial in FCC proceedings SCOTUSblog
- Supreme Court sounds ready to back agency authority over violations Roll Call
- Supreme Court seems wary of limiting federal regulators’ power in a data privacy case AP News
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Ars Technica