Brand Trial: Assistant Details 'Insane Appetite' and Normalized Misconduct

3 min read
Source: BBC
Brand Trial: Assistant Details 'Insane Appetite' and Normalized Misconduct
Photo: BBC
TL;DR

Former assistant Helen Berger testified that Russell Brand’s behavior was normalized by staff, describing his 'insane sexual appetite' and frequent requests for sex during work hours. The trial, which entered its third week, heard that Brand asked her to collect phone numbers from female fans, a request she refused. While Berger stated she never witnessed illegal acts, she noted that colleagues dismissed his conduct. The prosecution is concluding its case, with Brand’s defense expected to begin soon.

Key points

  • Helen Berger, Brand’s assistant from June 2006 to February 2007, stated he asked her to obtain phone numbers from female fans, which she refused after feeling uncomfortable.
  • Berger described Brand’s 'insane sexual appetite' and noted he often asked if he could 'go and have sex now' when frustrated with work tasks.
  • She claimed Brand used MySpace to find women and that his behavior was normalized by staff, leading her to believe it was 'just the way it is'.
  • Berger stated she never witnessed any illegal acts but observed Brand treat women poorly, including a incident where he 'switched off his charm' when a woman mentioned a boyfriend.
  • The prosecution is set to finish on Tuesday, with Brand’s defense team expected to argue that all sexual activity was consensual.

Background

This testimony is part of the ongoing trial for Russell Brand, who faces seven charges including three counts of rape and three of sexual assault. Previous coverage highlighted allegations spanning 1999 to 2009, including incidents at radio stations and his London home. Brand has consistently denied the charges, maintaining that all interactions were consensual. The trial has heard testimony from six complainants and various witnesses, including family members and colleagues.

How outlets are covering it

The BBC and The Guardian provided detailed accounts of Berger’s testimony, emphasizing the normalization of Brand’s behavior by his staff. The Guardian added specific details about Brand’s conduct in dressing rooms and his interactions with celebrities. Deadline focused on the emotional toll on Berger and the 'insane sexual appetite' description, noting that Brand’s defense is expected to begin soon. The Telegraph source was inaccessible due to a security block, so no perspective could be extracted from it. All accessible sources agreed on the core facts of Berger’s testimony but varied in the level of detail regarding specific incidents.

Why it matters

The testimony highlights the culture of normalization around high-profile figures, which may influence the jury’s perception of consent and power dynamics. It also underscores the challenges faced by assistants in reporting misconduct. The outcome of this trial could set precedents for handling allegations against celebrities and the role of staff in such cases.

What to watch

The prosecution is expected to conclude on Tuesday, followed by the start of Brand’s defense. Brand is anticipated to take the stand, and his defense team will argue that all sexual activity was consensual. The trial’s outcome will depend on the jury’s assessment of the evidence, including Berger’s testimony and the complainants’ accounts.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on BBC