Digger: A Sci-Fi Satire That Divides Critics and Threatens Warner Bros. Finances

Tom Cruise’s new film 'Digger,' directed by Alejandro G. Iñárritu, has opened to polarized reviews and poor box office projections. The movie, which features Cruise in heavy prosthetics as an oil tycoon, is a complex sci-fi satire about climate collapse and the role of art in processing loss. While critics are split on its artistic merit, the film is expected to underperform financially, adding pressure to Warner Bros. amid its merger with Paramount.
Key points
- The film is a multi-layered sci-fi satire where Cruise’s character, Digger Rockwell, causes a climate catastrophe via oil drilling in Greenland.
- The plot reveals that the main narrative is a play being rehearsed in a post-apocalyptic future, staged by the nephew of the real Digger Rockwell.
- Box office predictions range from $15 million to $19 million against a $125 million production budget, signaling a significant financial loss.
- Critics are divided: some find it moving and relevant, while others call it a 'lumbering white elephant' and a 'strained satire.'
- The film’s marketing was confusing due to its complex twists, which may have deterred audiences accustomed to Cruise’s action roles.
Background
Tom Cruise underwent a significant physical transformation for 'Digger,' reducing his daily makeup time from six hours to under an hour using timed drills. The film premiered in London on September 22, 2026, with a star-studded cast including Riz Ahmed and John Goodman. It is distributed by Warner Bros., a studio currently facing financial challenges and a pending $111 billion merger with Paramount Skydance.
How outlets are covering it
Gizmodo’s Germain Lussier praises the film as 'incredibly moving' and a 'movie for our times,' highlighting its message about finding solace through art. In contrast, The New York Times’ Manohla Dargis calls it a 'ponderous climate comedy' and a 'strained satire,' questioning the director’s vision. Scientific American’s Emma Gometz critiques the scientific accuracy, noting that the massive iceberg 'Judy' is unrealistic as ice shelves do not cause tsunamis. The Los Angeles Times focuses on the financial impact, noting that 'Digger' is unlikely to reverse Warner Bros.’ poor 2026 performance, which has seen only $437.7 million in domestic revenue compared to $1.8 billion in 2025.
Why it matters
The film’s performance will test the viability of auteur-driven, high-budget satires in a market dominated by blockbusters. Its failure could signal a shift in strategy for Warner Bros. as it merges with Paramount, which has a history of favoring blockbuster fare. Additionally, the film’s mixed reception highlights the difficulty of marketing complex, twist-heavy narratives to a general audience.
What to watch
Warner Bros. will likely rely on ancillary revenue streams like premium video on demand and streaming to recoup costs. The studio is also preparing for the release of 'The Cat in the Hat' in November and 'Dune: Part Three' at year's end. The Paramount-Warner merger is set to close on October 4, 2026, with the combined company facing a debt load of over $80 billion.
- Actually, We Have to Talk About Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ gizmodo.com
- ‘Digger’ Review: Even Tom Cruise Can’t Save This Strained Satire The New York Times
- Many will hate Tom Cruise's new movie, 'Digger.' NPR's film critic loved it NPR
- How accurate is the climate disaster in Tom Cruise’s new movie Digger? Scientific American
- Warner Bros. has had a tough year at the box office. Now, it’s bracing for ‘Digger’ Los Angeles Times
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on gizmodo.com