Texas Venue Retains $16K After Groom’s Death, Countersues Fiancée
A Hays County wedding venue is in a legal dispute with a woman whose fiancé died months before their scheduled wedding. Posey Meadows refused to refund nearly $16,000 paid by the couple, citing a nonrefundable contract, and subsequently countersued the surviving fiancée for breach of contract. The venue’s owner did not respond to requests for comment, while the fiancée’s attorney described the venue’s actions as a 'ghoulish windfall.'
Key points
- Diego Hernandez, 25, died in late April 2026, months before his planned November 20 wedding at Posey Meadows outside San Marcos.
- The couple had paid $15,909.28 toward the venue; the contract stated that cancellation would forfeit the money but did not address the death of a client.
- Posey Meadows owner Julie Campbell initially offered options like rescheduling or applying the balance to other events but later refused a refund during a phone call with the groom’s mother.
- The fiancée filed a lawsuit in late July 2026, describing the venue’s retention of funds as an 'unjust and ghoulish windfall.'
- Posey Meadows countersued the fiancée for breach of contract, alleging she refused to pay the remaining balance and failed to provide proof of death, though the death certificate was later filed in court.
Background
This dispute highlights the lack of standard contractual protections for clients in the event of a death, a gap noted in the court records. While earlier archive articles covered unrelated wedding-related tragedies, such as a Minnesota pastor’s death during a cruise wedding and an Iranian protester’s execution after a phone wedding, they do not provide direct legal precedent for this specific contract dispute. The current case is distinct in its focus on consumer contract law and venue liability in Texas.
Why it matters
This case raises questions about the enforceability of nonrefundable wedding contracts in the event of a client’s death. It may influence how venues draft future agreements and how courts interpret 'force majeure' or hardship clauses in consumer contracts. The outcome could set a precedent for other couples facing similar situations in Texas.
What to watch
The case is currently in Hays County district court. The next steps will likely involve discovery, potential mediation, or a trial to determine whether the venue’s contract terms are enforceable given the circumstances of the groom’s death. The fiancée’s attorney has already filed the death certificate, addressing the venue’s counterclaim regarding proof of death.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on KSAT