NYT Reporter Admits Discarding Notes in Holmes Quote Dispute
The New York Times reporter Amy Chozick confirmed she did not record the 2023 interview with Elizabeth Holmes and discarded her handwritten notes, leaving no hard evidence to verify or refute the disputed quote featured in the documentary 'You Can See Everything.'
Key points
- Amy Chozick stated she wrote down the contested quote in her notebook during a walk but discarded the notes after the 2023 publication, unaware they would become central to a future documentary.
- Elizabeth Holmes and her partner Billy Evans claim the quote was misreported, but Evans could not produce the audio recording he mentioned in the film.
- Chozick argues the surrounding context of the interview, which Holmes did not dispute, supports the accuracy of the quote.
- The documentary 'You Can See Everything' has become a box office hit, grossing $15 million in its opening weekend, while Evans reportedly seeks legal counsel to claim profits.
Background
This dispute centers on a 2023 New York Times profile of Elizabeth Holmes, which became a focal point in Nathan Fielder’s documentary 'You Can See Everything.' The film, which has generated significant box office revenue and critical debate regarding its portrayal of Holmes and her partner Billy Evans, highlights the tension between media accuracy and subject perception. Previous coverage noted that the documentary’s success has sparked broader discussions about the omission of Theranos fraud details and the potential for public sympathy for Holmes.
How outlets are covering it
Variety and AV Club both report that Chozick admitted to discarding her notes, a fact that leaves the quote unverified by hard evidence. However, they differ in emphasis: Variety highlights Chozick’s defense that the broader context of the interview supports the quote's accuracy, while AV Club focuses on the irony that Holmes and Evans lack evidence to prove their counter-claim. Both outlets note that Evans has since sought legal counsel to claim profits from the documentary, a move that contrasts with his earlier decision to forgo payment during filming.
Why it matters
The incident raises significant questions about journalistic standards and the long-term implications of discarding primary source materials. It also highlights the ongoing public fascination with Elizabeth Holmes and the Theranos scandal, as well as the commercial and legal ramifications of documentary filmmaking involving controversial figures.
What to watch
The documentary 'You Can See Everything' is set to expand to over 2,500 theaters, potentially increasing its box office performance. Billy Evans may pursue legal action to claim a share of the profits, while the debate over the accuracy of the 2023 profile continues to influence public perception of Holmes.
- New York Times reporter really wishes she held on to notes from disputed Elizabeth Holmes interview A.V. Club
- About That Contested Elizabeth Holmes Quote to The Times The New York Times
- Elizabeth Holmes Claims New York Times Misquoted Her. The Reporter Speaks Out After ‘You Can See Everything’ Release: ‘I Wish I’d Kept That Notebook’ Variety
- Watch Elizabeth Holmes Lie To Forbes About Theranos Forbes
- NY Times Reporter Elizabeth Holmes Accused of Misquoting Her Reacts to ‘You Can See Everything’ Controversy IMDb
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on A.V. Club