Peer-reviewed claim falsely labels researcher as sex robot expert
TL;DR
A researcher was mistakenly listed as an expert on sex robots in a published paper, which was later retracted due to data inaccuracies and inappropriate search methods, highlighting issues of research misconduct and the importance of accurate bibliometric analysis.
Topics:healthscience-and-research#academic-integrity#bibliometric-analysis#research-misconduct#retraction#science-and-research#sex-robots
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Retraction Watch