Newborn's condition worsens after heart surgery as Texas court delays custody ruling

A Dallas judge extended a restraining order preventing surrogate McKenna West from seeing or making medical decisions for her newborn, who is in critical condition after complications from a heart surgery. The biological parents, Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, testified they are committed to the child's care, while West maintains she cannot trust them to provide life-saving treatment. The case, which began with a dispute over a requested abortion, remains unresolved as the court delays a final custody decision.
Key points
- Judge Ashley Wysocki extended a temporary restraining order for 14 more days, barring West from medical decision-making or contact with the baby.
- The infant, legally named Rumi Ali Ahmed but called 'Baby Gabriel' by West, was re-intubated after his condition declined following a Norwood procedure.
- Gilkar and Ahmed testified they consented to the surgery and are pursuing further treatments, denying any refusal of care.
- West admitted to withholding medical records and traveling to Texas to avoid an abortion, citing a surrogacy contract clause.
- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton withdrew from the case after the baby received surgery, having previously secured emergency orders for life-saving care.
Background
This dispute began in April 2026 when the fetus was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). Gilkar and Ahmed requested termination, but West refused and relocated to Texas, where abortion is banned. A California court had previously designated the couple as legal parents, but West argues Texas law governs parentage after birth. The case highlights legal conflicts between surrogacy contracts, state abortion laws, and medical ethics.
How outlets are covering it
Fox News emphasizes the baby's critical condition and West's refusal to drop custody claims unless care is guaranteed. KERA News details the legal arguments, noting West's admission of withholding records and the judge's extension of the restraining order. CBS News highlights the emotional testimony from Gilkar, who described West as 'mentally unstable' and confirmed the couple's commitment to the child's health. AP News focuses on the procedural delays and the broader implications for surrogacy law across state lines.
Why it matters
The case tests the limits of surrogacy contracts and state jurisdiction in cases involving fetal abnormalities and abortion. It raises questions about parental rights, medical decision-making, and the role of state officials in private family disputes. The outcome could set precedents for how courts handle conflicts between intended parents and surrogates in multi-state arrangements.
What to watch
The court will rule on final custody and conservatorship after the 14-day extension. The baby is expected to remain in critical care for at least 30 days. Gilkar and Ahmed have requested a delay in the hearing on the temporary restraining order, while West continues to seek sole managing conservatorship.
- Surrogate, California couple clash in court as newborn fights for life after heart surgery Fox News
- A Surrogate Fled to Texas to Avoid an Abortion. Now She Wants Custody of the Baby. The New York Times
- Judge upholds restraining order, will rule on Alaska surrogate, California parents’ custody fight KERA News
- Dallas judge delays custody decision in surrogacy fight over newborn with heart defect CBS News
- California couple confront their surrogate in a Texas court as dispute over newborn escalates AP News
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Fox News