Cornell Accused Seeks to Disqualify AG James from Rape Probe Over Public Comments
A lawyer for a Cornell student accused of sexual assault is petitioning a judge to remove New York Attorney General Letitia James from the special prosecutor role, arguing her public support for the victim demonstrates bias. A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, while the university faces internal scrutiny and an external review.
Key points
- Lawyer Andrew Miltenberg filed a petition on October 7 arguing that Letitia James’s September 28 social media post supporting the victim disqualifies her from leading the criminal investigation.
- New York State Judge James Farrell will hear arguments on Thursday regarding whether to void Governor Kathy Hochul’s executive order appointing James as special prosecutor.
- James’s office argues that her statement was a single empathetic remark and that courts have limited authority to review the governor’s appointment powers.
- Cornell University is facing a no-confidence vote from its Faculty Senate regarding the administration’s handling of the 'ongoing crisis of sexual assault.'
- The university’s board of trustees has hired former deputy US attorney general Sally Yates to lead an independent investigation into the school’s response to the allegations.
Background
This legal challenge follows Governor Hochul’s October 1 appointment of James as special prosecutor, a move prompted by the failure of the Tompkins County District Attorney to pursue charges in the 2024 alleged gang rape of a student, known as Jane Doe, at a Chi Phi fraternity house. The case has intensified national debates over sexual assault laws and the handling of such incidents at elite institutions, with previous coverage highlighting divisions within the progressive coalition regarding voluntary intoxication laws and the impartiality of the special prosecutor.
Why it matters
The outcome of this hearing could determine whether the state’s top legal official remains involved in a high-profile criminal investigation, potentially setting a precedent for how public officials are evaluated for bias in sensitive cases. It also highlights the ongoing tension between political appointments and judicial impartiality in New York.
What to watch
Judge Farrell will rule on the motion to remove James following the Thursday hearing. Meanwhile, the Cornell Faculty Senate will vote on a non-confidence motion, and the external review led by Sally Yates will continue to assess the university’s handling of the allegations.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on CNN