AI Floods Midterm Campaigns: From Bot-Written Sites to Deepfake Ads
As the 2026 US midterms approach, artificial intelligence is increasingly shaping the electoral landscape through candidate websites, political advertising, and social media disinformation. Analysis by The New York Times reveals that many congressional candidates use AI chatbots to draft biographies and policy positions, sometimes resulting in errors or internal notes leaking onto public sites. In Pennsylvania, Republican gubernatorial candidate Stacy Garrity has deployed AI-generated ads featuring a digital facsimile of Governor Josh Shapiro, sparking debates over authenticity and disclosure. Meanwhile, The Washington Post found that major AI chatbots produce inaccurate voter guides, while The Guardian reports a surge in AI-driven disinformation on social media, exacerbated by reduced content moderation. These developments highlight growing concerns about the reliability of information and the potential for AI to manipulate voter perceptions.
Key points
- The New York Times analysis indicates widespread use of AI chatbots by congressional candidates to generate website content, including biographies and policy statements, with some instances of errors or internal notes appearing publicly.
- In Pennsylvania, Republican gubernatorial candidate Stacy Garrity’s campaign uses AI-generated ads featuring a digital likeness of Governor Josh Shapiro, which has drawn criticism from the Shapiro campaign and prompted calls for stricter disclosure laws.
- The Washington Post tested six major AI chatbots and found they produced serious errors when generating voter guides, such as referencing non-existent races or incorrect ballot information.
- The Guardian reports a significant increase in AI-driven disinformation on social media platforms ahead of the midterms, noting that reduced content moderation and reliance on AI for moderation allow more false claims to circulate.
- Pennsylvania lawmakers have passed legislation requiring disclosure of AI content in political ads, though it is not yet in effect, and there are ongoing debates about the appropriateness and regulation of AI in political advertising.
Background
Recent months have seen a rise in AI’s role in political campaigns, with earlier reports indicating that many GOP candidates have not followed President Trump’s midterm playbook, instead focusing on local issues. Polls show Democrats competitive in several red states, and early voting data indicates a Democratic surge, though Republicans are pushing for late turnout. Additionally, ICE has increased daily arrests, which has coincided with a surge in community detentions, potentially influencing voter sentiment.
How outlets are covering it
The New York Times emphasizes the prevalence of AI in candidate websites, highlighting both its utility and the risks of errors. The Washington Post focuses on the reliability of AI chatbots for voter information, pointing out significant inaccuracies. The Guardian highlights the broader impact of AI on disinformation and the challenges of content moderation, noting the role of social media platforms in amplifying false claims. WGAL focuses on the use of AI in political ads, particularly in Pennsylvania, and the debate over disclosure and regulation. Together, these sources illustrate a multifaceted challenge posed by AI in the 2026 midterms, from candidate messaging to voter information and disinformation.
Why it matters
The integration of AI into political campaigns and voter information systems raises significant concerns about the integrity of the electoral process. Errors in AI-generated content can mislead voters, while AI-driven disinformation can manipulate public opinion. As AI becomes more sophisticated, the need for robust regulations and transparency becomes increasingly urgent to ensure fair and informed elections.
What to watch
Pennsylvania’s new law requiring disclosure of AI content in political ads will take effect in December, but its impact remains to be seen. Lawmakers are considering further legislation to regulate AI in political advertising, and social media platforms are under pressure to enhance content moderation. The outcome of the midterms will likely be influenced by how effectively these measures are implemented and enforced.
- Candidate Websites Are Filled With A.I.-Written Text, Analysis Shows The New York Times
- AI-generated candidates in Pa. campaign ads spark debate over disclosure WGAL
- The Morning Risk Report: Tech, Social Media Companies Brace for Deepfake Scrutiny in Midterms Run-Up WSJ
- We asked AI chatbots to make voter guides. They invented races and misidentified candidates. The Washington Post
- AI-driven disinformation running rampant on social media before US midterms, experts warn The Guardian
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The New York Times